Choose the type, level, urgency, and length to start off.
The Biggest Mysteries of an Article Review
Have you ever wondered what the purpose of an article reviews is, and why do your instructors want you to pay so much attention to this type of assignment? Actually, reviews are everywhere - you should just look harder. What do you google first when a new movie is released? Obviously, you want to know someone else's opinion about it, and you're scouring the Internet for it. You may want to read professional critics' reviews, but more often than not we try to read the general opinion of the audience or our friends. The same happens when you want to get more info about books, music, singers, new games, some places, services, etc. Article review requires you to give your opinion concerning a particular printed piece, but you must do it in a more "academic" style and support your opinion with examples. So, don't get frustrated! In this article, we will explain how to write an article review so that it looks stronger and more substantial. So, let's not waste time and start learning how to review an article right now.
What is an article review?
This instruction is structured in a such a way as to make it easier for the reader to find the necessary information really fast. Here are the most commonly asked questions which all students, including you, usually ask when working on similar assignments.
What is an article review?
An article review is a piece of academic writing which combines a summary of an article and its evaluation.
Are there any particular features important for writing an article review?
- Your audience knows the subject you are reviewing. It means you can, and should, use specific terminology, addressing specific key points of the area you are analyzing. Don't be afraid to use it, because the readers no doubt know at least something about the subject. However, sometimes your instructors can indicate the level of awareness of the audience you are going to write for.
- In a review you are to write a summary of the key ideas, thoughts, finding, author's position. Your next step is to evaluate and critique this article, as well as the author's contribution to the corresponding sphere and importance of his article. In other words, it will have two parts, so don't start your review with critique. Before moving on to the second step, lead the readers into the subject matter of your article, giving them some background about the author of this article.
- Your critical evaluation should be based on your own knowledge, understanding of the subject and your ability to provide your own reasoning. It means your critique should be based on certain proof and logical evidence.
What about an article review format?
The format of your article review will depend on the academic style you have to use. Before assigning a written task, your teacher generally provides you with the essential info about the style, pages, an overall number of articles to review, sources, etc. We recommend that you acquaint yourself thoroughly with the recommendations as soon as you get them so that you have the opportunity to ask questions, if you have any, and get answers. If you read your teacher's instructions at the last moment, it will be more difficult for you to contact them and get help. Your teacher may be busy and won't be able to give you any advice.
After reading the instructions, you'll be able to know an academic style you need to adhere to and adjust your work accordingly. There are four common styles, and you probably know them - APA, MLA, Harvard, and Chicago. Commonly reviews are written in APA and MLA style, but there are exceptions to this rule. Mind the peculiarities of each style! Among other things, pay attention to in-text citations, formatting of sources, reference list, etc.
Do I need a title page for my review?
This question is closely connected to the previous one. According to the general rules, MLA doesn't require you to have a title page. However, you should double check your teacher's instructions, as sometimes there may be a special note about it. Requirements for an APA article review title page are no different than those to general title pages. It should be written on a separate page and include all info about the authors (institutions, names, etc.).
Organizing an article review structure
How do you ensure an effective review article structure?
The good news is that an article review is structured using a generalized format. It means that it has a title (or a title page), an abstract, an introduction, a body and a summary (conclusion). You should not forget about the references, either!
The abstract should deal with the rationale, topicality, key findings, and general summary; it shouldn't exceed 300 words, either. It also makes sense to give some general idea of the paper, introduce the readers to the topic, its importance and give any background info about the article and its author if it is important for future understanding. The body text will address the article itself. The structure of this part may be different depending on the topic and purpose of the review. In the conclusion, you should provide the summary of your evaluation.
Article review introduction
How to start an article review?
The only way to start a review is to write an introduction. Sometimes your teacher may ask you to add a page with the title of the article you are reviewing as well as referencing info. For this reason, make sure to double-check your teacher's instructions.
How to write an introduction to an article review?
If there are no additional requirements, an article review introduction starts with the same info about the article and where it was published. The next paragraph introduces the key elements and ideas for the readers. It is important to show your ability to analyze such things. The last paragraph may demonstrate your work as an evaluator and provide a small clue on the importance and validity of the article, as well as its place and role in the overall research in this particular area. It is important to link the content of the article with your knowledge of the discipline the article is dedicated to.
Use this short article review introduction example as a guide and try to figure out the main ideas for your future paper:
According to the general definition, discourse is a rather broad term which is related both to written and spoken communication. M. Foucault in his article "What is an Author?" uses the word 'discourse' to refer to a text written by a particular writer (author) and its features. Apart from using the term to represent a concept of written text, Foucault also touches upon such topics as the mode of the discourse and its variation within each culture.
This term is important, as it is widely used in different contexts and connected not only to the literature. It depends on historical and social situations within each society and, therefore, influences its culture as well. The article discusses the connection between the name of the author and the discourse features. Foucault is interested in the connection between the author and the discourse features of the text. He questions whether the discourse changes if a function such as the author of the text disappears. He also looks into how the mode of discourse, its function and the principles of the text analysis, as well as the overall perception of the text, get impacted.
Writing your article review conclusion
The last part of this guide deals with the main ideas for ending the review. Obviously, all you need is a conclusion. This is the last part, but a lousy conclusion can spoil a good review. Hopefully, it won't happen with you after you read this guide.
How to write a conclusion for an article review?
Write your article review conclusion in such a way as to show the work you've conducted. It should demonstrate your understanding of everything you've done in the article and your reasons for doing so. Give your point of view and support it with concrete examples, if needed.
This is article review conclusion example which helps you understand the key ideas.
The topic of the article is important for people studying discourse features and history, doing this for the benefit of those interested in the history of discourse analysis. The article points out that in fiction the text isn't a discourse feature. Instead, it says the author is a peculiar feature of a discourse. Even though the text was written in the 19th century, it raises a rather important issue. Nowadays, people tend to judge any text based on the name of its author. If the author is well-known and successful, the audience might react better to him rather than to a lesser known author or the one who had some failures. It makes people pay more attention to the author than to the work itself. This tendency is observable not only in literature but also in many other spheres of culture, with many artists and designers facing such a problem as well.
And that's pretty much it! Writing an eligible article review isn't a hard thing to do if only you apply enough effort and knowledge. And remember - if coming up with this paper proves way too effort-consuming for your taste, our custom writing service is always ready to help. Good luck!back to all posts